EV Charging Calculator

Skoda Enyaq vs Volkswagen ID.4: charging compared

Charging curves overlaid, time-to-charge at every common UK charger speed, and per-network cost — modelled on each car's actual charging behaviour.

At a 150kW UK rapid (10% → 80%): the Skoda Enyaq finishes in 30m; the SkodaEnyaq is within a minute.

The Skoda Enyaq iV 80 and the Volkswagen ID.4 Pro share the MEB platform, the same 77kWh battery, the same 175kW peak charging and the same 11kW AC onboard charger. From a charging perspective they're sister cars — what you save in time on one, you save on the other.

Both follow the identical MEB charging curve: 175kW peak around 10-20% SOC, tapering steadily through the mid-band, dropping below 80kW above 70% SOC. There is no meaningful charging difference between them. A 350kW ultra-rapid charger gives them no benefit — the cars are capped at 175kW.

Real-world efficiency is also nearly identical (305-310Wh/mile in mixed UK driving). Cost per mile on any home tariff or public network is within a penny. The Skoda is a few hundred kg lighter on some trims, which gives it a marginal edge on motorway efficiency.

Choose by price and dealer experience — the Enyaq is typically slightly cheaper for the same kit, the ID.4 has a wider dealer network, and the Skoda's interior is arguably the more thoughtful design. Charging isn't a tiebreaker.

iV 80 77kWh
Battery77kWh Peak DC175kW Architecture400V Real-world252mi
Pro 77kWh
Battery77kWh Peak DC175kW Architecture400V Real-world252mi
Charger speed

Charging behaviour

Charger 150kW 050100150200 0%20%40%60%80%100% kW SOC %
  • Skoda Enyaq
  • Volkswagen ID.4

Time to charge by charger speed

SOC range 15% → 80%. Cells softer where the charger speed exceeds the car's peak DC — higher chargers deliver the same time.

Car 7kW22kW50kW100kW150kW250kW350kW400kW
Skoda Enyaq
7h 9m
avg 7kW
4h 33m
avg 11kW
1h 0m
avg 50kW
34m
avg 89kW
29m
avg 104kW
28m
avg 106kW
28m
avg 106kW
28m
avg 106kW
Volkswagen ID.4
7h 9m
avg 7kW
4h 33m
avg 11kW
1h 0m
avg 50kW
34m
avg 89kW
29m
avg 104kW
28m
avg 106kW
28m
avg 106kW
28m
avg 106kW

Public network cost

15% → 80% session at PAYG rates, cheapest 5 rapid networks.

Network Enyaq ID.4
Tesla Supercharger
58.0p/kWh
£29.03£29.03
Pod Point
62.0p/kWh
£31.03£31.03
Believ
66.0p/kWh
£33.03£33.03
SWARCO eVolt
75.0p/kWh
£37.54£37.54
Allego
78.0p/kWh
£39.04£39.04

Home charging cost

Full 0% → 100% on each common UK tariff, cheapest rate slot.

Tariff Enyaq ID.4
British Gas Electric Driver
9.5p/kWh (Off-peak)
£7.32£7.32
EDF GoElectric Overnight
9.0p/kWh (Off-peak)
£6.93£6.93
E.ON Next Drive
6.7p/kWh (Off-peak)
£5.16£5.16
Intelligent Octopus Go
6.9p/kWh (Off-peak)
£5.31£5.31
Octopus Go
8.5p/kWh (Off-peak)
£6.54£6.54
OVO Charge Anytime
7.0p/kWh (EV charging slot)
£5.39£5.39
Standard Variable Price Cap
27.8p/kWh (Standard)
£21.41£21.41

Cost per mile

Real-world Wh/mile efficiency × representative tariffs.

Scenario Enyaq ID.4
Home smart off-peak 2.0p/mile2.0p/mile
Tesla Supercharger 17.7p/mile17.7p/mile
BP Pulse PAYG 27.1p/mile27.1p/mile

Considering any of these cars?

Salary sacrifice schemes typically save 30-40% on the monthly cost of an EV by paying through pre-tax salary. Common UK providers include The Electric Car Scheme, Octopus Electric Vehicles, Loveelectric and Tusker. We're working on partnerships so we can link directly — for now, read how we make money.

Common questions

Are the Enyaq and ID.4 actually the same car?

Same MEB platform, same battery options, same motors. Different exteriors and interiors, but technically near-identical. Charging behaviour is the same.

Does either benefit from a 350kW charger?

No. Both peak at 175kW; the extra 175kW is wasted. Use a 150kW unit if it's cheaper or more convenient.

Which is more efficient in the real world?

Within 5% of each other. The Skoda Enyaq is typically marginally lighter and posts slightly better motorway figures, but daily UK driving is essentially the same.

Related comparisons